Sunday, December 12, 2021

Ministerial scrutiny of Israel's largest institution for children with disabilities?

I have written often and over a long period about the chain of institutions here in Israel called ALEH

It originally consisted of four residential facilities in different cities housing a total of some 800 babies, children and adults. 

I have never had anything favorable to say about the operation, to put it mildly. I am not a fan of theirs and am opposed to the core values for which they stand.

ALEH, as a chain of institutions for children with special needs, has pretty much disappeared as a brand name. On this archived website, you can see how they used to call themselves "Israel’s Largest Network of Care for Children with Severe Multiple Disabilities" as if that were something to be proud of.

No longer. 

About two years ago, Doron Almog, who established ALEH's Negev branch, announced that it would thenceforth be partnering with the Jerusalem branch under the name ADI and under his leadership. The remaining two branches, one in Gedera and the second in Bnei Brak, would operate as part of a separate entity under the ALEH name and under the leadership of Rabbi Yehuda Marmorstein.

The entire transformation has been characterized by fog and confusion.

This post is triggered by something unusual: a discussion that was due to be held in Israel's Cabinet today (Sunday, December 12, 2021). It's not clear to me that the discussion happened or whether it was pushed off. We will probably soon know.

The institution formerly called ALEH Negev, now branded ADI, has enjoyed "etrog" status in the Israeli government as some of my previous posts indicated. 


The following letter which appeared today in a Whatsapp group to which I belong is being widely circulated among Israel's activists for the rights of people with disabilities. It is written in Hebrew but here is an unofficial English translation:

At a cabinet meeting scheduled for today, December 12, 2021, the following proposal will be discussed: That tens of millions of shekels be granted to ADI Negev, an institution for people with disabilities. The proposal's details are unknown to us but the very intention to allocate millions of shekels to this institution raises concerns that this is a plan which contravenes, in whole or in part, the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which was ratified by the State of Israel in 2012.

One of the treaty's core tenets is the right to live within the community, the right to fully participate in society and and the right to inclusion in society. The Convention, and its official interpretation, oppose outright the existence of institutions and of residential frameworks with institutional characteristics. These include, among others, residences with a large number of people with disabilities in one place, segregation away from the general community, the inability of the individual to make decisions - even the most basic decisions - regarding his life and so on.

Therefore states that have ratified the treaty are required to prepare a plan that will eventually lead to the closure of all such institutional frameworks for people with disabilities, while developing community services for them.
 
Needless to say, international law prohibits the allocation of resources to further the operations of institutional frameworks.

It will be recalled that even the international committee appointed by the Ministry of Welfare a decade ago, ordered the closure of all institutions within a decade.

Yet, despite all of the above, instead of closing institutions the government [of Israel] is now acting to expand existing ones.

The ADI Negev institution is home to over 150 people. Over the years, more services have been added around this institution, all of them intended for people with disabilities, including employment opportunities. This lifestyle, involving the concentration of people with disabilities in one place, where they live and work - and all of this far from the "normative" community - contravenes international law. 

Every addition of resources to the institution and to the segregated services surrounding it (excluding the rehabilitation hospital) contravene the international treaty and the values of equal human rights.

We therefore call upon the Ministers to oppose this decision today pending a transparent public debate and the clarification of the decision's details and of its compliance with the guidelines detailed above.

The extremely well-connected Doron Almog who heads the operation can't be too happy today.

No comments:

Post a Comment